Miracle at
St Anna and Inglorious Bastards comparison
Miracle at
St’ Anna (2008) was directed by Spike Lee. It follows the story of four black American soldiers
during WW2 from the British perspective. It displays the friendships between
characters and how their environment affects their emotions. Inglorious Bastards
(2009), was directed by Quentin Tarantino is similarly set during World War 2,
however, this is taken from a French Jewish viewpoint and displays the emotions
towards the Hitler and the Nazis in a
negative way. Evidently these films are set in the same time frame but display
different opinions on the war; however both want Hitler and the Nazis to
perish.
Miracle at
St’ Anna provided a cliff hanger beginning. In the first scene we witness an
unidentified character being shot in broad daylight this automatically opens up
questions. Who shot him? Why did they? What did they do? This for me was a very
successfully beginning because automatically your attention is caught and you receive
an understanding of the situation. Alternatively
Inglorious Basterds begins with a family being interrogated until a hibernating
Jewish family is discovered and shot ( all but the eldest daughter). This
already answer your questions and in a way the film could have ended right
there in that first scene there was an introduction, climax, and cliff hanger
ending. There for the following scene was like a new start to the film.
Inglorious
Bastards follows a linear narrative, linear narratives follow a straight line;
starting at the beginning, moving to the middle and proceeding to the end of
the story, however there was a part of the film that jumps from 1941 to 1944.
Miracle at St’ Anna on the other hand
follows a nonlinear narrative because it is usually set during the war which in
context of the film is the past and is shown in flashbacks. I feel that Miracle
at St’ Anna was harder to follow as it was very disjointed, by doing this my
interest slipped at times as the film wasn’t able to grasp my full attention.
In
conclusion I preferred inglorious bastards. My reasoning behind this is the
story line was a lot easier to follow I fully understood the plot which engaged
me until the very end of the film. I also feel that Quentin Tarantino’s imaginative
take on the war allowed us to have an insight into a Jewish woman’s
perspective. Throughout the film we are aware of her position in society at
this time which added suspense onto her getting rediscovered by the Nazis.
Genre? why should we always start with the genre Robyn? This bit covers the very basics of the two films , you do not dig any deeper in order to have or show an AS Level understanding of the key American case studies.
ReplyDeleteWhat elements do you think you could have included to enhance this piece?